88 Groups Say Rep. Whitfield’s Pro-Polluter Bill Undermines Health and Climate Action
WASHINGTON (April 29, 2015) – Eighty-eight leading conservation, Latino, health, scientific and environmental organizations today urged lawmakers to reject a bill to delay federal climate action authored by Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-KY), saying it would give polluters free rein to keep dumping unlimited amounts of dangerous carbon pollution into our air.
“This dangerous legislation undermines climate action by allowing states simply to ‘opt out’ of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan (CPP), which sets the first national standards limiting carbon pollution from power plants...We urge you to oppose this latest attack on our health, the Clean Air Act and efforts to reduce harmful carbon pollution,” the groups said in a letter sent to Capitol Hill.
The letter is signed by, among others, Moms Clean Air Force, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Sierra Club, the League of Conservation Voters, Clean Water Action, Environment America, the Environmental Defense Fund, Physicians for Social Responsibility, the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Kentucky Environmental Foundation.
The letter –which notes that the Clean Air Act is one of the most successful public health laws in the nation’s history—was sent to members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. It is scheduled to vote today on Whitfield’s bill, titled the “Ratepayer Protection Act.”
The EPA unveiled the Clean Power Plan last June and is moving to finalize the plan setting national carbon pollution limits this summer. Polls show that a strong majority of Americans support the Clean Power Plan and want action to reduce the threat of climate change.
Despite that support, Republican leaders this year have pushed a Big Polluter agenda on Capitol Hill seeking to block the carbon pollution standard, and to dismantle health and environmental protections.
In addition to Whitfield, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has taken a leading role in opposition to the Clean Power Plan. He has, however, struggled to gain support in the Senate and in the states for obstructing the plan. He’s expected to raise his opposition directly with EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy today in a Senate appropriations subcommittee hearing.
The text of the letter to the House Energy and Natural Resources Committee follows:
April 27, 2015
Dear Representative,
On behalf of our millions of members, the undersigned organizations urge you to oppose Representative Whitfield’s Ratepayer Protection Act. This dangerous legislation undermines climate action by allowing states simply to "opt out" of the EPA's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which sets the first national standards limiting carbon pollution from power plants. It also seeks to delay implementation of the CPP indefinitely until every polluter’s lawsuit has been litigated.
The Clean Air Act was enacted in 1970 by an overwhelming bipartisan majority and signed into law by President Richard Nixon. Congressional leaders rightly recognized that air pollution is a national problem and leaving pollution control entirely to the states had failed. This state-federal partnership has made the Clean Air Act one of the most successful public health laws in our nation’s history. Since 1970, we have cut many dangerous air pollutants by 90 percent or more, while our economy tripled in size. Millions of lives have been saved and illnesses avoided.
The Clean Air Act directs the Environmental Protection Agency to set national clean air standards – in this case, standards for carbon pollution from the nation’s power plants. The law gives states the first shot at meeting these national standards, by writing state-specific pollution control plans tailored to local conditions, with the flexibility to meet the emissions reductions required in the most cost-effective way. But if a state cannot, or will not, hold its own polluters accountable, the law guarantees that communities have a federal back-stop.
This bill strikes at the heart of the federal Clean Air Act by letting each state simply walk away from national clean air requirements, giving polluters free rein to continue to dump unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into our air. The legislation sets a dangerous precedent by allowing any state to decide that meeting national clean air standards is merely optional. It would destroy the national guarantee that makes the Clean Air Act work: the assurance that EPA will directly regulate the big polluters if a state cannot, or will not do so.
Whitfield’s bill would also delay implementation of the Clean Power Plan in every state until every polluter’s lawsuit has been fully litigated and appealed, including to the Supreme Court – a process that can take years. This is not the way the Clean Air Act works and is just another way to delay climate action as long as possible.
The Clean Air Act already provides for “staying” implementation during lawsuits if the litigants can prove valid reasons. This bill would instead stall the Clean Power Plan by default, as long as a lawyer can keep the case alive even if there is no proof of irreparable harm or likelihood of success.
The Whitfield bill would destroy the national guarantee that makes the Clean Air Act work by simply letting any state just "opt out" of meeting national carbon standards and it would delay critical carbon pollution standards indefinitely until every polluter's lawsuit has run its course.
We urge you to oppose this latest attack on our health, the Clean Air Act, and efforts to reduce harmful carbon pollution.
Sincerely,
350 Bay Area 350 Silicon Valley Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments Appalachian Voices Arkansas Public Policy Panel Center for Biological Diversity Center for Climate Change and Health |
Clean Air Council |
Clean Water Action Climate 911 Climate Parents Climate Resolve Conservation Colorado Conservation Voters for Idaho Conservation Voters of South Carolina |
Earthjustice Environmental Law and Policy Center |
Environment America Environment Arizona |
Environment California Environment Colorado Environment Connecticut Environment Florida Environment Georgia |
Environment Maine Environment Massachusetts Environment Maryland |
Environment New Jersey |
Environment New Mexico Environment New York Environment Texas |
Environment Virginia |
Environmental Advocates of New York |
Environmental Defense Fund |
Environmental Law and Policy Center |
Friends of the Earth – US GreenLatinos Greenpeace |
Interfaith Power & Light Iowa Environmental Council Kentucky Environmental Foundation |
KyotoUSA |
League of Conservation Voters |
League of Women Voters Maine Conservation Alliance Maine Conservation Voters Michigan League of Conservation Voters Moms Clean Air Force Montana Conservation Voters Montana Environmental Information Center |
Natural Resources Defense Council New Energy Economy New Jersey League of Conservation Voters North Carolina League of Conservation Voters |
PennEnvironment |
PennFuture Physicians for Social Responsibility |
Protect Our Winters Program on Climate & Health Public Citizen |
Rachel Carson Council |
Safe Climate Campaign |
Sierra Club Sierra Club - Delta Chapter Sierra Club - Florida Chapter Sierra Club - Grand Canyon (Arizona) Chapter Sierra Club - Hoosier Chapter Sierra Club - Maine Chapter Sierra Club - Michigan Chapter Sierra Club - North Carolina Chapter Sierra Club - Tennessee Chapter Sierra Club - West Virginia Chapter Southern Environmental Law Center Southern Oregon Climate Action Now State Organizing for Community eMpowerment (SOCM) Texas League of Conservation Voters |
The Center for the Celebration of Creation The Climate Reality Project |
Union of Concerned Scientists Virginia Conservation Network Virginia League of Conservation Voters Voces Verdes Washington Conservation Voters Washington Environmental Council WE ACT for Environmental Justice |
Western Organization of Resource Councils Wisconsin Environment Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters |